city: be used to go shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to go shop 1.00
has shop 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(town, has shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(city, be used to go shop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(town, has shop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(town, has shop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(town, has shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(city, be used to go shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(city, be used to go shop)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(city, has shop)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(city, has shop)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(city, has shop)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(city, has shop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(city, be used to go shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(city, be used to go shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(town, has shop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(city, be used to go shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(town, has shop)