city: is dirty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, medina
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dirty 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is dirty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(new york city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(new york city, is dirty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(city, is dirty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, is dirty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(city, is dirty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, is dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new york city, is dirty)