claim: be considered umbrella

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lie
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.61
, belief
Weight: 0.61
, speculation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings proof
Weight: 0.69
, appeal
Weight: 0.59
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.59
, breach
Weight: 0.58
, intrusion
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered umbrella 1.00
be considered umbrella of argument 0.90
umbrella of argument 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(claim, be considered umbrella)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(claim, be considered umbrella of argument)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(claim, umbrella of argument)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(claim, be considered umbrella of argument)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(claim, umbrella of argument)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(claim, umbrella of argument)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(claim, umbrella of argument)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(claim, be considered umbrella of argument)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(claim, be considered umbrella of argument)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(claim, be considered umbrella)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(claim, be considered umbrella)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(claim, be considered umbrella)