class: were in olmec social structure ordered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.60
, status
Weight: 0.58
, free time
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hunter
Weight: 0.60
, fighter
Weight: 0.59
, physics
Weight: 0.59
, algebra
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in olmec social structure ordered 1.00
be important in social townplaning 0.77
be preferred over structure 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(class, were in olmec social structure ordered)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(class, be important in social townplaning)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(class, be important in social townplaning)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(class, be important in social townplaning)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(class, be preferred over structure)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(class, be important in social townplaning)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(class, be preferred over structure)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(class, be preferred over structure)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(class, be preferred over structure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(class, were in olmec social structure ordered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(class, were in olmec social structure ordered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(class, were in olmec social structure ordered)