classical: is theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents classical music
Weight: 0.64
, style
Weight: 0.57
, influence
Weight: 0.55
, composition
Weight: 0.53
, type
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chamber music
Weight: 0.35
, country music
Weight: 0.35
, opera
Weight: 0.35
, baroque
Weight: 0.35
, ragtime
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is theory 1.00
is organizational theory 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(style, is theory)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(classical, is theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(style, is theory)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(style, is theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(style, is theory)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(classical, is theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(classical, is theory)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(classical, is organizational theory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(classical, is organizational theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(classical, is organizational theory)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(classical, is organizational theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(classical, is theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(classical, is theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(style, is theory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(classical, is theory)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(style, is theory)