clay: be better making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.65
, particle
Weight: 0.60
, mineral
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings kaolinite
Weight: 0.48
, muscovite
Weight: 0.44
, wollastonite
Weight: 0.43
, asphalt
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better making 1.00
be used making 0.88
be made 0.83
be used make 0.82
be suitable making 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(material, be made)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(clay, be better making)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mineral, be made)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(clay, be better making)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(material, be used make)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(clay, be better making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(material, be used make)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mineral, be made)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(material, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mineral, be made)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(material, be made)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(material, be used make)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, be used make)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(material, be made)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(clay, be better making)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mineral, be made)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(clay, be better making)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(material, be used make)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(clay, be better making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(asphalt, be used make)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(asphalt, be used make)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(clay, be better making)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(clay, be used making)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(clay, be used make)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(clay, be used making)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(clay, be made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(clay, be used make)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(clay, be used making)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(clay, be suitable making)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(clay, be used make)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(clay, be made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(clay, be made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(clay, be suitable making)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(clay, be suitable making)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(clay, be used making)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(clay, be made)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(clay, be suitable making)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(clay, be used make)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(clay, be better making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(material, be used make)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(material, be made)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mineral, be made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(asphalt, be used make)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(material, be used make)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(material, be made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(clay, be better making)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mineral, be made)