clay: is rock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.65
, particle
Weight: 0.60
, mineral
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings kaolinite
Weight: 0.48
, muscovite
Weight: 0.44
, wollastonite
Weight: 0.43
, asphalt
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rock 1.00
goes in with rock cycle 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mineral, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(clay, is rock)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mineral, is rock)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mineral, is rock)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mineral, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(clay, is rock)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(clay, is rock)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(clay, goes in with rock cycle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(clay, goes in with rock cycle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(clay, goes in with rock cycle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(clay, goes in with rock cycle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(clay, is rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(clay, is rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mineral, is rock)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(clay, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mineral, is rock)