cleanliness: be important in kitchen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, standard
Weight: 0.62
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.34
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.32
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in kitchen 1.00
be in kitchen 0.97
be important in restaurant 0.79
be in must cooking 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(consistency, be important in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in kitchen)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be in kitchen)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be in kitchen)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be in kitchen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be in kitchen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be in must cooking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be in must cooking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be in must cooking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be in must cooking)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in kitchen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in restaurant)