cleavage: be out of fashion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, condition
Weight: 0.46
, reaction
Weight: 0.46
Siblings nipple
Weight: 0.32
, boob
Weight: 0.31
, bra
Weight: 0.31
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.31
, skirt
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be out of fashion 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cleavage, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, be out of fashion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cleavage, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pubic hair, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, be out of fashion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cleavage, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(cleavage, be out of fashion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(cleavage, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cleavage, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cleavage, be out of fashion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cleavage, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cleavage, be out of fashion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cleavage, be out of fashion)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pubic hair, be out of fashion)