clerk: be shot in white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office worker
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.60
, court
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, cashier
Weight: 0.35
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be shot in white 1.00
be shot in black 0.98
be in white 0.81
be in black 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(clerk, be shot in white)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clerk, be shot in black)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(clerk, be shot in black)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(clerk, be shot in black)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(clerk, be shot in black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(clerk, be in white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(clerk, be in black)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(clerk, be in white)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(clerk, be in black)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(clerk, be in white)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clerk, be in black)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(clerk, be in white)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(clerk, be in black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(clerk, be shot in white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(clerk, be shot in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(clerk, be shot in white)