clerk: mark bills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office worker
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.60
, court
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, cashier
Weight: 0.35
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
mark bills 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(clerk, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cashier, mark bills)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(clerk, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(cashier, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cashier, mark bills)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(clerk, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(clerk, mark bills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(clerk, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(clerk, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(clerk, mark bills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(clerk, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(clerk, mark bills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(clerk, mark bills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cashier, mark bills)