cleveland: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, ohio
Weight: 0.62
, team
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.57
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, miami
Weight: 0.36
, boston
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
have air quality today 0.80
have bad reputation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(miami, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, have bad reputation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(boston, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(boston, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(boston, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(miami, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(miami, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(philadelphia, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cleveland, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cleveland, have air quality today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cleveland, have bad reputation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, have bad reputation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cleveland, have air quality today)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cleveland, have air quality today)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cleveland, have bad reputation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, have air quality today)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cleveland, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cleveland, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(miami, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(philadelphia, have bad reputation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(boston, has quality bad)