:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cave, be formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cave, is formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hill, be created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hill, be formed)
...
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cliff, is formed)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(cave, is formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hill, be formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cliff, be formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cave, be formed)
...