climber: be at mountain

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents people
Weight: 0.58
, form
Weight: 0.48
, plant
Weight: 0.44
, woman
Weight: 0.43
Siblings ivy
Weight: 0.51
, sherpa
Weight: 0.49
, young person
Weight: 0.31
, con artist
Weight: 0.31
, surfer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mountain 1.00
climb mountain 0.91
step down mountain 0.86
lead mountaineer to peak 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(young person, be at mountain)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, lead mountaineer to peak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(sherpa, lead mountaineer to peak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sherpa, lead mountaineer to peak)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(young person, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(young person, be at mountain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.07
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(climber, be at mountain)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(climber, climb mountain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(climber, climb mountain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(climber, climb mountain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(climber, climb mountain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(climber, be at mountain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(climber, be at mountain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sherpa, lead mountaineer to peak)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(climber, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(young person, be at mountain)