clinton: was great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liberal
Weight: 0.65
, politician
Weight: 0.63
, candidate
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bill clinton
Weight: 0.72
, jesse james
Weight: 0.35
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, john smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was great 1.00
is great 0.97
was good 0.90
is perfect 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(clinton, was great)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(clinton, is great)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(clinton, is great)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(clinton, is great)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(clinton, is great)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(clinton, was good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(clinton, is perfect)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(clinton, is perfect)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(clinton, is perfect)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(clinton, is perfect)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(clinton, was good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(clinton, was good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(clinton, was good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(clinton, was great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(clinton, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(clinton, was great)