clipper: be at barbershop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.48
, team
Weight: 0.48
, device
Weight: 0.47
, instrument
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nail clipper
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.33
, grinder
Weight: 0.32
, compass
Weight: 0.31
, razor blade
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at barbershop 1.00
be at barber shop 0.86
be at salon 0.81
be at music shop 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(instrument, be at music shop)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(clipper, be at barbershop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(instrument, be at music shop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be at music shop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(instrument, be at music shop)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at barbershop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(clipper, be at barbershop)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at barber shop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at salon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(clipper, be at barber shop)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(clipper, be at barber shop)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(clipper, be at salon)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at barbershop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(clipper, be at barbershop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(instrument, be at music shop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(clipper, be at barbershop)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(instrument, be at music shop)