clipper: be at bathroom

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.48
, team
Weight: 0.48
, device
Weight: 0.47
, instrument
Weight: 0.47
Siblings nail clipper
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.33
, grinder
Weight: 0.32
, compass
Weight: 0.31
, razor blade
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bathroom 1.00
be at bathroom cabinet 0.90
be at basement 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(clipper, be at bathroom)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tool, be at basement)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at basement)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at bathroom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(clipper, be at bathroom)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(clipper, be at bathroom cabinet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at bathroom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(clipper, be at bathroom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, be at basement)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(clipper, be at bathroom)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, be at basement)