clog: be favored by women

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shoe
Weight: 0.59
, style
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.42
, issue
Weight: 0.42
Siblings loafer
Weight: 0.30
, stout
Weight: 0.30
, lace
Weight: 0.30
, flip flop
Weight: 0.30
, baroque
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be favored by women 1.00
be favored by modern women 0.95
be in men 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(clog, be favored by women)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in men)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in men)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(clog, be favored by women)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(clog, be favored by women)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(clog, be favored by modern women)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clog, be favored by modern women)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(clog, be favored by modern women)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(clog, be favored by modern women)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(clog, be favored by women)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(clog, be favored by women)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(issue, be in men)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(clog, be favored by women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(issue, be in men)