cloning: have success rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, practice
Weight: 0.55
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.33
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.32
, euthanasia
Weight: 0.32
, hybridization
Weight: 0.32
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have success rate 1.00
have low success rate 0.97
have failure rate 0.84
have high failure rate 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cloning, have success rate)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cloning, have low success rate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cloning, have low success rate)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cloning, have low success rate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cloning, have high failure rate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(cloning, have high failure rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cloning, have high failure rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cloning, have failure rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cloning, have failure rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cloning, have failure rate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cloning, have low success rate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cloning, have failure rate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cloning, have high failure rate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cloning, have success rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cloning, have success rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cloning, have success rate)