cloning: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, practice
Weight: 0.55
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.33
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.32
, euthanasia
Weight: 0.32
, hybridization
Weight: 0.32
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cloning, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cloning, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(nanotechnology, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cloning, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cloning, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(cloning, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cloning, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cloning, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cloning, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cloning, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cloning, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was invented)