clothes: be famous in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.60
, necessity
Weight: 0.58
, furniture
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings diaper
Weight: 0.64
, t shirt
Weight: 0.63
, sweatshirt
Weight: 0.61
, robe
Weight: 0.61
, gown
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous in australia 1.00
be in australia 0.95
be in australia expensive 0.93
be expensive in canada 0.83
get to uk 0.79
be made in uk 0.79
be cheaper in usa 0.78
be in thailand 0.76
be in thailand cheap 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(clothes, be famous in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(furniture, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(furniture, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(clothes, be famous in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(clothes, be famous in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(clothes, be famous in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(clothes, be famous in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(clothes, be famous in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(furniture, be expensive in canada)