clothing store: go out of business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.79
, store
Weight: 0.76
, business
Weight: 0.68
, restaurant
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.41
, hardware store
Weight: 0.40
, convenience store
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
go out of business 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(clothing store, go out of business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(restaurant, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(clothing store, go out of business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(restaurant, go out of business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(store, go out of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, go out of business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(store, go out of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, go out of business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(clothing store, go out of business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(restaurant, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(clothing store, go out of business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(grocery store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grocery store, go out of business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(clothing store, go out of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(clothing store, go out of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(restaurant, go out of business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, go out of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grocery store, go out of business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(restaurant, go out of business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(clothing store, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, go out of business)