cloud: be used to shade

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trend
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings smoke
Weight: 0.57
, sky
Weight: 0.33
, dark matter
Weight: 0.32
, comet
Weight: 0.32
, meteor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to shade 1.00
shade build 0.94
shade sun 0.93
be used to bring shade 0.93
be used to sun 0.78
be used to hide sun 0.77
cover sun 0.77
hide sun 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sky, be used to sun)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sky, be used to sun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sky, be used to sun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cloud, be used to shade)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cloud, shade sun)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cloud, shade build)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cloud, shade sun)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cloud, shade build)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cloud, shade build)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cloud, be used to shade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cloud, be used to shade)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cloud, be used to shade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sky, be used to sun)