cluster: compare to clusters of t tauri stars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents configuration
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings nebula
Weight: 0.33
, quasar
Weight: 0.32
, rectangle
Weight: 0.32
, string theory
Weight: 0.32
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to clusters of t tauri stars 1.00
compare to clusters 0.89
be older than clusters 0.77
be made of stars 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cluster, compare to clusters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cluster, compare to clusters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cluster, be made of stars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cluster, be made of stars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cluster, be made of stars)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cluster, compare to clusters)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cluster, be made of stars)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cluster, compare to clusters)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cluster, be older than clusters)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cluster, be older than clusters)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cluster, be older than clusters)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cluster, be older than clusters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cluster, compare to clusters of t tauri stars)