coal: be hotter than flames

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.63
, fuel
Weight: 0.62
, ore
Weight: 0.62
, mineral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings peat
Weight: 0.56
, lignite
Weight: 0.52
, iron ore
Weight: 0.37
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.36
, gas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hotter than flames 1.00
burn hot 0.80
burn without flame 0.79
burning of is change 0.76
be burned 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(coal, be hotter than flames)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(coal, burn without flame)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(coal, burn without flame)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(coal, burn without flame)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(coal, burn without flame)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(coal, burn hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(coal, burn hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(coal, burn hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coal, burn hot)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coal, burning of is change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(coal, burning of is change)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(coal, burning of is change)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(coal, burning of is change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(coal, be hotter than flames)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(coal, be hotter than flames)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(coal, be hotter than flames)