coastline: be important to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, area
Weight: 0.53
, mountain range
Weight: 0.48
, issue
Weight: 0.48
Siblings shoreline
Weight: 0.35
, coast
Weight: 0.35
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.34
, falkland islands
Weight: 0.33
, beach
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to humans 1.00
be important to us 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coast, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(coast, be important to us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(coast, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(coast, be important to humans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(coast, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(coast, be important to us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(coastline, be important to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(coastline, be important to us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be important to us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(coastline, be important to us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coastline, be important to us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be important to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coastline, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(coast, be important to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coastline, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(coast, be important to us)