cobbler: is cutters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.71
, craftsman
Weight: 0.50
, trade
Weight: 0.49
, cake
Weight: 0.48
, project
Weight: 0.48
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, lemon curd
Weight: 0.36
, apple pie
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cutters 1.00
is cutters too 0.96
is key cutters 0.95
is key cutters too 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cobbler, is cutters)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, is cutters too)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, is key cutters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, is key cutters too)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cobbler, is cutters too)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cobbler, is key cutters too)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cobbler, is cutters too)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cobbler, is key cutters too)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cobbler, is key cutters)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cobbler, is cutters too)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cobbler, is key cutters too)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cobbler, is key cutters)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cobbler, is key cutters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cobbler, is cutters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cobbler, is cutters)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cobbler, is cutters)