coca cola: have most carbonation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have most carbonation 1.00
have more fizz 0.76
taste better in glass 0.76
produce more fizz 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, taste better in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coca cola, have most carbonation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soda pop, have more fizz)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, taste better in glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(coca cola, have most carbonation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soda pop, have more fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(soda pop, have more fizz)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(coca cola, have most carbonation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, have most carbonation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coca cola, have most carbonation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(soda pop, have more fizz)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coca cola, have most carbonation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in glass)