cockney: is offensive jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialect
Weight: 0.57
, accent
Weight: 0.46
, person
Weight: 0.44
, english
Weight: 0.29
, variety
Weight: 0.22
Siblings creole
Weight: 0.31
, mandarin
Weight: 0.30
, american english
Weight: 0.30
, catalan
Weight: 0.30
, punjabi
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is offensive jokes 1.00
is offensive 0.89
is offensive line 0.87
has quality jokes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(creole, is offensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(creole, is offensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(creole, is offensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(american english, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(american english, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cockney, is offensive jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cockney, is offensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cockney, is offensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(cockney, is offensive line)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cockney, is offensive line)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cockney, is offensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cockney, is offensive line)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cockney, has quality jokes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cockney, has quality jokes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cockney, has quality jokes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cockney, is offensive line)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cockney, is offensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cockney, has quality jokes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cockney, is offensive jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(creole, is offensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cockney, is offensive jokes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(american english, has quality jokes)