coding: is damn hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.57
, computer science
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.54
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34
, transcription
Weight: 0.32
, editing
Weight: 0.32
, typing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is damn hard 1.00
has quality damn 0.90
is hard 0.86
be popular thing do 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coding, is damn hard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(computer science, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coding, is damn hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is hard)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(typing, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(editing, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(coding, is damn hard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(computer science, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(coding, is damn hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(editing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(editing, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(typing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(typing, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(coding, is damn hard)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(coding, has quality damn)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coding, is hard)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(coding, has quality damn)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(coding, has quality damn)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(coding, is hard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(coding, be popular thing do)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coding, is hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(coding, be popular thing do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(coding, be popular thing do)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coding, has quality damn)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(coding, is hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(coding, be popular thing do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coding, is damn hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(typing, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(editing, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(coding, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)