codon: be in groups of 3

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stop codon
Weight: 0.67
, sequence
Weight: 0.48
, parameter
Weight: 0.40
, factor
Weight: 0.39
Siblings centromere
Weight: 0.30
, filename
Weight: 0.30
, polynomial
Weight: 0.29
, terminator
Weight: 0.29
, vector
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in groups of 3 1.00
be in groups of three 0.92
be in groups 0.91
be in 2 back theatres 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(terminator, be in 2 back theatres)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(terminator, be in 2 back theatres)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(terminator, be in 2 back theatres)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(codon, be in groups of 3)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(codon, be in groups)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(codon, be in groups)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(codon, be in groups)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(codon, be in groups of three)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(codon, be in groups of three)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(codon, be in groups of three)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(codon, be in groups of three)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(codon, be in groups)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(codon, be in groups of 3)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(codon, be in groups of 3)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(codon, be in groups of 3)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(terminator, be in 2 back theatres)