coil: is replaced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, magnetic field
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.58
, pattern
Weight: 0.55
Siblings thermistor
Weight: 0.34
, helix
Weight: 0.34
, rod
Weight: 0.33
, dipole
Weight: 0.33
, spline
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is replaced 1.00
need replaced 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rod, need replaced)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(rod, is replaced)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(rod, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(rod, is replaced)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(rod, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rod, need replaced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(coil, is replaced)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(coil, need replaced)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(coil, need replaced)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(coil, need replaced)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(coil, need replaced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(coil, is replaced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coil, is replaced)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rod, is replaced)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(coil, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rod, need replaced)