coke: be at movie

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.67
, soda
Weight: 0.65
, soda pop
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings diet coke
Weight: 0.39
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.33
, cola
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at movie 1.00
be at drive-in movie 1.00
be at theater 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soda, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coke, be at movie)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coke, be at movie)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(soft drink, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coke, be at movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be at movie)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(soda, be at movie)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soda, be at movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be at movie)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at movie)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at theater)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soda, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coke, be at movie)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coke, be at movie)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(soft drink, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coke, be at movie)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pepsi, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be at movie)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pepsi, be at theater)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be at theater)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(coke, be at movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coke, be at movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soft drink, be at movie)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soda, be at movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pepsi, be at movie)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pepsi, be at theater)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soft drink, be at movie)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(coke, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soda, be at movie)