cold storage: be at refrigerator

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents storage
Weight: 0.68
, warehouse
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, supermarket
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer disk
Weight: 0.34
, grain elevator
Weight: 0.32
, postal service
Weight: 0.32
, weather
Weight: 0.32
, fast food
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at refrigerator 1.00
be at your freezer 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cold storage, be at refrigerator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(storage, be at refrigerator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(storage, be at refrigerator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cold storage, be at refrigerator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(cold storage, be at refrigerator)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cold storage, be at your freezer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cold storage, be at your freezer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at your freezer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cold storage, be at your freezer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at refrigerator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cold storage, be at refrigerator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(storage, be at refrigerator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(cold storage, be at refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(storage, be at refrigerator)