cold water: be than denser water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gas
Weight: 0.67
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
, water
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hot water
Weight: 0.83
, mackerel
Weight: 0.58
, liquid water
Weight: 0.39
, ocean water
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than denser water 1.00
is denser water 0.99
be than less denser water 0.98
is denser then water 0.98
be than denser hot water 0.97
be than denser warm water 0.96
be than less denser warm water 0.96
is denser hot water 0.95
is denser then hot water 0.94
be heavier than water 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hot water, be heavier than water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hot water, be heavier than water)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hot water, be heavier than water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cold water, be than denser water)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cold water, be than denser hot water)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cold water, be than less denser warm water)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cold water, is denser then hot water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cold water, be heavier than water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cold water, be than denser hot water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cold water, be than denser hot water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cold water, be than denser hot water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cold water, is denser then hot water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cold water, be than less denser warm water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cold water, be heavier than water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cold water, be heavier than water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cold water, be than less denser warm water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cold water, be heavier than water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cold water, be than less denser warm water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cold water, is denser then hot water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cold water, is denser then hot water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cold water, be than denser water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cold water, be than denser water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cold water, be than denser water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hot water, be heavier than water)