collar: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
Siblings neck
Weight: 0.58
, hot dog
Weight: 0.33
, coat
Weight: 0.32
, sweater
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(collar, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(collar, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(collar, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(collar, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(collar, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(collar, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(collar, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(collar, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(collar, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(collar, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for dogs)