colony: were formed in massachusetts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents territory
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.55
, settlement
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rhode island
Weight: 0.67
, new south wales
Weight: 0.62
, honey bee
Weight: 0.62
, virginia
Weight: 0.59
, falkland islands
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
were formed in massachusetts 1.00
were formed in georgia 0.85
were formed 0.81
was formed 0.79
be formed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(city, be formed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(colony, were formed in massachusetts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(city, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(city, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(virginia, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(city, be formed)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(colony, were formed in massachusetts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(virginia, was formed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(virginia, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(colony, were formed in massachusetts)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(colony, was formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(colony, were formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(colony, be formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(colony, was formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(colony, were formed)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(colony, were formed in massachusetts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(colony, were formed in massachusetts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(city, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(virginia, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(colony, were formed in massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(city, be formed)