colony: were were called

Property	Similarity
were were called	1.00
were important to phoenicia	0.86
were formed	0.80
was found	0.78
were needed by nations	0.76
was started	0.76

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(colony, were formed)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(colony, were important to phoenicia)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(colony, was found)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(colony, were formed)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(colony, was started)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(colony, were important to phoenicia)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(colony, was started)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(colony, were important to phoenicia)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(colony, was found)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(colony, was started)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(colony, were formed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(colony, was found)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(colony, were important to phoenicia)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(colony, was started)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(colony, was found)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(colony, were were called) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(colony, were formed)

Parents	territory Weight: 0.57 , place Weight: 0.55 , city Weight: 0.55 , settlement Weight: 0.53
Siblings	rhode island Weight: 0.67 , new south wales Weight: 0.62 , honey bee Weight: 0.62 , virginia Weight: 0.59 , falkland islands Weight: 0.56

colony: were were called

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings