color blindness: be more common in males

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blindness
Weight: 0.73
, disease
Weight: 0.64
, vision
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.35
, glaucoma
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in males 1.00
be more common than females 0.96
occur in more males than females 0.93
be less common among females 0.93
be more prevalent in males 0.93
occur more in males 0.91
affect more males 0.91
affect males 0.89
is more common 0.86
be rare in females 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be more prevalent in males)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be more prevalent in males)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(color blindness, be more prevalent in males)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be rare in females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(color blindness, be more prevalent in males)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(color blindness, be rare in females)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be rare in females)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, occur more in males)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be less common among females)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, occur in more males than females)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(color blindness, be more common than females)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(color blindness, occur more in males)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(color blindness, be rare in females)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, is more common)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(color blindness, occur more in males)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(color blindness, occur in more males than females)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(color blindness, occur more in males)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, affect more males)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(color blindness, affect males)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(color blindness, occur in more males than females)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(color blindness, occur in more males than females)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(color blindness, be less common among females)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(color blindness, affect more males)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(color blindness, be less common among females)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(color blindness, is more common)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(color blindness, be less common among females)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(color blindness, affect males)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(color blindness, affect more males)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(color blindness, affect more males)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(color blindness, is more common)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, affect males)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(color blindness, is more common)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(color blindness, affect males)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(color blindness, be more common in males)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(color blindness, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(color blindness, be more common in males)