colour: look on different computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.56
, quality
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, part
Weight: 0.53
Siblings characteristic
Weight: 0.28
, key
Weight: 0.28
, influence
Weight: 0.28
, attribute
Weight: 0.28
, consequence
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
look on different computers 1.00
is different 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(element, is different)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(colour, look on different computers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(element, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(element, is different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(element, is different)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(colour, look on different computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(colour, look on different computers)

Similarity expansion

0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(colour, is different)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(colour, is different)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(colour, is different)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(colour, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(colour, look on different computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(colour, look on different computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(element, is different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(colour, look on different computers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(element, is different)