columbia: be cheaper than north face

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, central american country
Weight: 0.60
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, south carolina
Weight: 0.59
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, florida
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than north face 1.00
be cheaper than face 0.95
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(university, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(columbia, be cheaper than north face)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(university, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(university, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(charleston, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(university, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than north face)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(charleston, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(charleston, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(columbia, be cheaper than north face)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than face)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(columbia, be cheaper than face)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than face)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(columbia, be cheaper than face)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(columbia, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(columbia, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(columbia, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(columbia, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(columbia, be cheaper than north face)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(university, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(charleston, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(columbia, be cheaper than north face)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(university, is expensive)