columbia: be good place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, central american country
Weight: 0.60
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, south carolina
Weight: 0.59
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, florida
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place live 1.00
be best place live 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(charleston, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(charleston, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(charleston, be good place live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(columbia, be good place live)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(columbia, be best place live)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be best place live)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(columbia, be best place live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(columbia, be best place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be good place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(columbia, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(charleston, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(columbia, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, be good place live)