columbus: seem poor hockey market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.63
, city
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.62
, ohio
Weight: 0.62
Siblings newport
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, springfield
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
seem poor hockey market 1.00
is poor hockey market 0.98
seem hockey market 0.96
is hockey market 0.93
is poor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(columbus, seem poor hockey market)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is poor hockey market)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(columbus, is poor hockey market)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(columbus, is poor hockey market)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(columbus, seem hockey market)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(columbus, seem hockey market)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(columbus, seem hockey market)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(columbus, is poor hockey market)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(columbus, seem hockey market)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(columbus, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(columbus, is poor)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(columbus, is poor)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(columbus, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(columbus, seem poor hockey market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(columbus, seem poor hockey market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(columbus, seem poor hockey market)