columbus: was given credit discovering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.63
, city
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.62
, ohio
Weight: 0.62
Siblings newport
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, springfield
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was given credit discovering 1.00
was credited discovering 0.82
be credited discovering 0.81
get credit 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(columbus, was given credit discovering)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(columbus, was credited discovering)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(columbus, get credit)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(columbus, be credited discovering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(columbus, get credit)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(columbus, was credited discovering)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(columbus, be credited discovering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(columbus, was credited discovering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(columbus, be credited discovering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(columbus, get credit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(columbus, be credited discovering)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(columbus, was credited discovering)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(columbus, get credit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(columbus, was given credit discovering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(columbus, was given credit discovering)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(columbus, was given credit discovering)