commander: derank themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.60
, general
Weight: 0.57
Siblings commodore
Weight: 0.48
, police officer
Weight: 0.38
, lieutenant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
derank themselves 1.00
kill themselves 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(general, kill themselves)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(commander, derank themselves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(general, kill themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(general, kill themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(general, kill themselves)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(commander, derank themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(commander, derank themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(commander, kill themselves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(commander, kill themselves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(commander, kill themselves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(commander, kill themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(commander, derank themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(commander, derank themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(general, kill themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(commander, derank themselves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(general, kill themselves)