communicate: requires enunciate clearly

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.46
, word
Weight: 0.43
, example
Weight: 0.37
, time
Weight: 0.35
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.30
, talk
Weight: 0.30
, common sense
Weight: 0.30
, message
Weight: 0.30
, sign language
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires enunciate clearly 1.00
requires speak out loud 0.78
be used to convey mean verbally 0.77
requires speak outloud 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to convey mean verbally)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires speak out loud)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires speak outloud)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(talk, requires speak out loud)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(talk, requires speak out loud)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(talk, be used to convey mean verbally)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(talk, be used to convey mean verbally)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(talk, requires speak outloud)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(talk, requires speak outloud)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(talk, requires speak outloud)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(talk, requires speak out loud)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(communicate, requires enunciate clearly)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(talk, be used to convey mean verbally)