communicating: be for people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.51
, method
Weight: 0.44
, action
Weight: 0.41
, ability
Weight: 0.40
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.34
, communicate
Weight: 0.33
, speaking
Weight: 0.33
, listening
Weight: 0.33
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for people 1.00
be important to others 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(listening, be for people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(listening, be for people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(listening, be for people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(communicating, be for people)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(communicating, be important to others)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(communicating, be important to others)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(communicating, be important to others)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(communicating, be important to others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(communicating, be for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(communicating, be for people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(communicating, be for people)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(listening, be for people)