communicating: was across empire more difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.51
, method
Weight: 0.44
, action
Weight: 0.41
, ability
Weight: 0.40
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.34
, communicate
Weight: 0.33
, speaking
Weight: 0.33
, listening
Weight: 0.33
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was across empire more difficult 1.00
was across empire difficult 0.99
was across empire more difficult for inca 0.93
was across empire 0.93
was across empire difficult for inca 0.92
is difficult 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(listening, is difficult)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(talking, is difficult)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(speaking, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(speaking, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speaking, is difficult)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(talking, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(talking, is difficult)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(listening, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(listening, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult for inca)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire difficult for inca)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult for inca)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(communicating, was across empire difficult for inca)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(communicating, was across empire difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult for inca)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(communicating, was across empire difficult)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(communicating, was across empire difficult)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(communicating, was across empire difficult for inca)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(communicating, was across empire)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(communicating, was across empire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult for inca)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(communicating, is difficult)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communicating, was across empire difficult for inca)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(communicating, is difficult)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(communicating, was across empire)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(communicating, is difficult)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(communicating, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(communicating, was across empire more difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(speaking, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communicating, was across empire more difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(listening, is difficult)