communication: be defined by communicators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined by communicators 1.00
be defined 0.80
be defined by scholars 0.78
be defined by different scholars 0.78
be used for communication 0.75
be used in communication 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used for communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(infrared, be used in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(infrared, be used in communication)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(infrared, be used for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(infrared, be used for communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(communication, be defined by communicators)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(communication, be defined)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(communication, be defined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be defined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(communication, be defined)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(communication, be defined)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(communication, be defined)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(communication, be defined)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(communication, be defined)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be defined by communicators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(communication, be defined by communicators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(infrared, be used in communication)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be defined by communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(infrared, be used for communication)