communication: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
be important for relationship 0.99
be important for good relationship 0.97
be good in relationship 0.97
be needed in relationship 0.94
be hard in relationship 0.94
has state relationship 0.93
be important in relationships 0.93
be important in life 0.75
be important part of life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in relationship)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(failure, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in relationship)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(failure, be important in life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(failure, be important part of life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in life)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important part of life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in relationship)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(failure, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communication, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(communication, be important in life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(communication, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(communication, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)